I stumbled upon this while searching for a particular feminist quote I enjoy in the friendzone tag:
Um. No. Just no to all of this. NO. Let’s break this whole load of shit down, shall we?
First of all, why is female in quotes? If a female behaves in a way that doesn’t work to your advantage, does that mean she’s not really a female? No one but a person with any sort of feminine gender has the right to say what a female is, and what being a female means to them. So deeming a group inferior and not ‘real females’ was a rather shitty way to start off a shitty post.It’s upsetting that it begins by saying he’s ‘done and finished.’ Because the next huge bit talks about very legitimate problems: how there is a cultural, institutionalized pattern of abuse and other mistreatment against women. No wonder she doesn’t want to be in another relationship—do you think if you were the victim of violence you’d have an easy time trusting again? Of course not. Did you ever consider that the pattern of misogyny is why you’re experiencing this problem in the first place, and your current ‘freindzoning’ complaints are only perpetuating that misogyny? Apparently not, because instead of anger at the sexist system, the rest of the post is just a victim-blaming, slut-shaming tantrum.
I’m assuming the ‘GREAT’ guy she’s ignoring is anyone who identifies with this post. Well, if you keep writing arrogant, sexist bullshit like this, you’re definitely not as great as you think you are. A lot of people can pick up on that; no wonder they don’t want to be with you. But maybe this mentality was just a one-time slip up when you were mad and not thinking clearly—maybe you actually are a great guy. Even in that case, if she doesn’t want to date you, SHE DOESN’T WANT TO DATE YOU. You’re going to have to fucking accept that. You can be the greatest guy ever; that doesn’t mean you’re the greatest for her. I know rejection hurts, but you have to understand she’s not ‘friendzoning’ you to punish you, she really just does not want to sleep with you or date you or whatever the hell it was.
Now, who even says the female is in a relationship with the guy she’s fucking two hours later or whatever? If she wants to have casual sex you’re going to have to accept that too. You have no right to have a monopoly on her sex life, especially since you’re NOT EVEN TOGETHER. She said no to you, remember? On the other hand, maybe she is in the relationship with this supposed ‘asshole.’ I would urge you to consider if you think he’s an asshole because he’s essentially cockblocking you. The situation could also be that you legitimately just think he’s a bad guy, but she thinks he’s good. Again, not your place to make decisions for her. And maybe it turns out that he is an asshole to her. In this case, if you actually did care about her, you would TRY TO HELP HER, rather than throwing a jealous fit and shaming her for her decisions.
The next bit that says, ‘Dear females’ is also really distressing because it makes so many generalizations. That all females have behaved in this way, that all females want to be with men, and that this situation only occurs with the genders in these roles. That’s clearly not true—women can feel ‘friendzoned’ also, it’s just not so much a symptom of sexism based oppression. In fact, this post sort of proves that it can work the other way as well, because it sets up a basis for being able to say females aren’t ‘good’ because their sex lives function in a way that doesn’t immediately benefit you! Not all females are looking for ‘the good guys,’ and if they are somehow doing something to make the not so good likes of you scarce, then I applaud them.
The only part of this I agree with is the end. Yep, thanks for exposing yourself as a New Found Asshole. We all appreciate it. Now it’s easier to spot you and stay the fuck away. Because you have a right to feel disappointed if you don’t get to sleep with and/or date a certain girl, but you do not have the right to villainize and shame her for exercising her right to not sleep with and/or date you.
Even this horrible word, ‘friendzone,’ implies that you started in a more intimate zone, and she was forced to remove you from it. You don’t get to feel entitled to intimate relationships with a woman and then feel punished when she tells you you’re not entitled because—guess what—that attitude is the reason so many women have been in abusive situations, it’s why we constantly need to be on our guard around strange men, it’s why many of us are wary to begin relationships in the first place.
So, New Found Asshole, next time you think you’ve been ‘friendzoned,’ try to remember the reason it happened was you.
Idris Elba confirms he’s returning for THOR 2 -
benedict cumberbatch at the baftas: “[steven moffat is] a very not misogynist husband to his wife”
what the fuck even is that sentence
#and you would fucking know cumby? #because you’re in their house and their bedroom? #and as if that changes #his misogynistic writing even if it is true? #benedict cumberbatch #is a fucking asshole
yeah I really have developed some baddd feels for benedict, I mean what the fuck no one’s even saying he’s bad to his wife, but he’s an overrated piece of sexist shit and I can’t stand the accolades and the bullshit hero worship of a man who has made a career out of writing women in fucked up ways.
That sentence is like “some people are saying things about him and I’m in the total obligation of defend his honor by saying something out of fucking nowere” And suddenly we should just shut up and believe becase he said that sentence. Instead of waiting for Moffatt to act like and adult to his critics or just write some decent female character who’s primary plot line is not about waiting for a man, obsess over a man, being a man’s doormat or being constantly rescued for one. Maybe.
This is why gender neutral bathrooms are necessary
(via fuckyeahfeminists)
[video]
COULSON
(via xaviersschoolforgiftedyoungsters)
Let's look at the twitter thing from the beginning -
These are the tweets from Moffat that started the whole debacle surrounding sexualities. If you just look quickly, and isn’t very familiar with LGBTQ rights, this looks like a pretty cool thing. Because the Doctor doesn’t care about sexualities, and that’s… good. But this isn’t what this implies. He claims that The Doctor doesn’t see sexuality, and doesn’t understand it, and needs to have it explained to him. This is problematic because The Doctor has encountered a pretty decent number of non straight characters over the years. He was the one who explained Jack’s sexuality to Rose, he was aware of when Shakespeare was hitting on him and he knew and was aware of that present day academics are discussing Shakespeare’s sexuality.
The Doctor: Come on! We can have a good flirt later!
William Shakespeare: Is that a promise, Doctor?
The Doctor: Oh, fifty-seven academics just punched the air. Come on.He knows of Human sexuality, knows how it works, and knows about the discussions surrounding it. If anything, my guess would be that he has a better grasp of it than we do, since he’s been following humanity for such a long time he ought to have a good understanding of the history of oppression and the problems that present day queer people still are faced with. Why doesn’t he already have a universal marriage setting on that screwdriver of his?
I’m pretty shure that that’s how it was back in Budapest
[video]
[video]